Every country has its own history, its history has contributed significantly to the development of that country. Any piece of land between latitude and longitude is a piece of land if there is no emotional and cultural connection to it.
When we talk of nationalism and patriotism, it is important to understand the context because it is the context itself that gives us that perspective so that we can better connect ourselves to the piece of land that lies between the latitude and longitude lines. In the map of Atlas, we can see each terrain divided into different nations, their division of this boundary can be seen as a product of the circumstances of different time segments.
The nationalism that has arisen from western countries appears to be determining the boundaries of the nation, or that nationalism has been born due to nationalism, and the main thing which has been kept in mind in the creation of these nations is their language, their caste. And their cultural heritage, but when we talk about the nation of India or India, the view of the West here seems to be somewhat narrow or old,
If we understand nationalism mainly in the Indian context, then we see two factions of it which are influenced by the west and the other who hypothesize nationalism as the basis of Indian culture and literature.
If the major writers of nationalism are to be taken into account, be it Lenner, Conn, Grace, Hanner, Terry Anderson or Adam Smith, all these are going on in their own time, in a period of political upheaval or change of power. To say or to confirm the creation of the nation, he himself is struggling with nationalism or was trying to explain it according to that period,
If talked about in the Indian context, Premchand "calls nationalism a leper of his times".
And Ravindra Nath Tagore "Python and snake same policy nationalism"
It is addressed that if one looks at the time and circumstances of these two, or the Quit India movement in 1943, where nationalism was reaching its peak in the Indian context, then the leader of the Conservative Party Garam Dal of India, Babasaheb Ambedkar, strongly opposed it. They were doing it, but Gandhi never called them as male traitors,
If we understand nationalism in Indian relation, then the vision of the West gives rise to thousands of nations in India, or hundreds of new nations emerge on the basis of language, creation of constitutional values at the grassroots level has emerged with great complexity in India. ,
There is a fundamental difference between the western approach and the Indian point of view, if we understand carefully, the unity that is talked about in Indian nationalism is an important contribution of Indian heritage culture and cultural history from east to west or from north to south. Since India is surrounded by a wide variety of cultures and linguistic disparities, despite this, they all have the same dedication. That dedication, if understood as Indian nationalism, seems more appropriate and far-sighted,
The reasoning behind this can be argued that every citizen of the border in which India is present respects Aryabhatta, the inventor of "Zero", as much as Abdul Kalam Azad, for Taxila and Nalanda themselves. The person feels proud and with yoga, the caste widens the world by looking at its heritage, culture and scientific history.
Nationalism, socialism, capitalism or imperialism,
Each system leading from the dispute to the dispute would leave its end in Hardaur after its initial phase, with some stability in its medieval period.
It is his personal vision for every man to express his ideas and keep his understanding on the subject, but this attitude of Indians is due to his inherited culture, science and cultural heritage,
That is why Vasudev Kutumbakam's talk is as easy for an Indian as it is for the western civilization.
No comments:
Post a Comment